<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Born Weird</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.byrnecreative.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.byrnecreative.com/blog</link>
	<description>Design - Mac - Web - Politics - Football - More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:50:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Inception Questions by Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.byrnecreative.com/blog/2010/07/inception-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byrnecreative.com/blog/?p=229#comment-254</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your thoughts guys. It&#039;s funny, after writing this post and thinking further I came to several conclusions that are different from yours (that also differ from one another). I&#039;d sorta decided that *only* your deep subsconscious can mess with dreams, e.g. Cobb bringing in Mol, which answers #5 and means #1 has to be that the architect builds them in. But then I remembed that during training Ariadne was able to do all sorts of manipulations, and Eames is able to &quot;forge,&quot; both of which require conscious, rather than subsconscious, dream manipulation.

I&#039;m definitely still hung up on question 1.... clearly people have them in the dream worlds, we know that because we see them. But is it really that somehow your subconscious just always knows? That seems... I dunno, kinda lame and inconsistent somehow.

I think your answers to #2 are right. I have trouble buying that that&#039;s what his mind would come up with, but I just need to let it go I think.

I like your explanation for 6 — we can guess that even totems aren&#039;t that convincing in limbo because you&#039;re so far down, or something.

Thanks for your help. Keep &#039;em coming, people! I&#039;m interested in what others think...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your thoughts guys. It&#8217;s funny, after writing this post and thinking further I came to several conclusions that are different from yours (that also differ from one another). I&#8217;d sorta decided that *only* your deep subsconscious can mess with dreams, e.g. Cobb bringing in Mol, which answers #5 and means #1 has to be that the architect builds them in. But then I remembed that during training Ariadne was able to do all sorts of manipulations, and Eames is able to &#8220;forge,&#8221; both of which require conscious, rather than subsconscious, dream manipulation.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m definitely still hung up on question 1&#8230;. clearly people have them in the dream worlds, we know that because we see them. But is it really that somehow your subconscious just always knows? That seems&#8230; I dunno, kinda lame and inconsistent somehow.</p>
<p>I think your answers to #2 are right. I have trouble buying that that&#8217;s what his mind would come up with, but I just need to let it go I think.</p>
<p>I like your explanation for 6 — we can guess that even totems aren&#8217;t that convincing in limbo because you&#8217;re so far down, or something.</p>
<p>Thanks for your help. Keep &#8216;em coming, people! I&#8217;m interested in what others think&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inception Questions by Mick Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.byrnecreative.com/blog/2010/07/inception-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byrnecreative.com/blog/?p=229#comment-253</guid>
		<description>Ok this is what I got, not complete, but I&#039;m not sure it can be.


1)  I dont think the totems should be brought into the dream.  But are carried in real life only.  The worry being that someone could fake your totem in a dream.. and that is why you never let anyone know the exact details of the totem

2) Fischer populated the dream, including his father.  His mind was trying to figure out what browning was hiding from him, and thus created his father in the safe room complete with the will.

3)I think he still suspected Browning at that point, that is one of the reason that Browning apologizes.  But it seems that Browning has excepted the fate of the company in Fischers hands.  on the plane, I dont know if he really remembers much of the dream (if any) 

4) Good point, I think it could have gotten a bit more crazy, maybe not all the way to tim burton tho.

5) I dont think they want to bring anything more in to the dream, as things change the more forceful the attacks would become.  There could have been some balance in this.  Cobb cant keep her out.

6) I think if you dont intentional put your self in to Limbo (ie, if you die in the dream and are forced to limbo) then you dont remember how you go there, or what the reality is.  Thus Saito vaguely remembered something (a half remembered dream) but it hadnt been enough to convince him to kill him until Cobb showed up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok this is what I got, not complete, but I&#8217;m not sure it can be.</p>
<p>1)  I dont think the totems should be brought into the dream.  But are carried in real life only.  The worry being that someone could fake your totem in a dream.. and that is why you never let anyone know the exact details of the totem</p>
<p>2) Fischer populated the dream, including his father.  His mind was trying to figure out what browning was hiding from him, and thus created his father in the safe room complete with the will.</p>
<p>3)I think he still suspected Browning at that point, that is one of the reason that Browning apologizes.  But it seems that Browning has excepted the fate of the company in Fischers hands.  on the plane, I dont know if he really remembers much of the dream (if any) </p>
<p>4) Good point, I think it could have gotten a bit more crazy, maybe not all the way to tim burton tho.</p>
<p>5) I dont think they want to bring anything more in to the dream, as things change the more forceful the attacks would become.  There could have been some balance in this.  Cobb cant keep her out.</p>
<p>6) I think if you dont intentional put your self in to Limbo (ie, if you die in the dream and are forced to limbo) then you dont remember how you go there, or what the reality is.  Thus Saito vaguely remembered something (a half remembered dream) but it hadnt been enough to convince him to kill him until Cobb showed up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inception Questions by nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.byrnecreative.com/blog/2010/07/inception-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byrnecreative.com/blog/?p=229#comment-252</guid>
		<description>Benihana. I heart you! 
1) I guess the basic premise is that ultimately you can trust yourself to know deep down inside whether you&#039;re dreaming or not.
2) Cobb plants the idea in Fisher&#039;s subconscious, and when Fisher thinks he;s in Browning&#039;s dream but is instead in his own dream, he can&#039;t help but think of the original idea. Because he can&#039;t control his subconscious. Kind of like Leonardo&#039;s suicidal wife. Yeah, it&#039;s weak. 
3) Because it&#039;s a dream. And after all nothing was stolen. And he will think that breaking up the company is his idea because he only knows about dream theft, not inception. Suspend disbelief, Ben--it&#039;s more fun.
4) I don&#039;t dream like Tim Burton. do you?
5) totally. More importantly, why is Leonardo the only person with issues? I could not be on that team.
6) Too many questions. You try to kill yourself (in your dreams) and let me know how that works out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benihana. I heart you!<br />
1) I guess the basic premise is that ultimately you can trust yourself to know deep down inside whether you&#8217;re dreaming or not.<br />
2) Cobb plants the idea in Fisher&#8217;s subconscious, and when Fisher thinks he;s in Browning&#8217;s dream but is instead in his own dream, he can&#8217;t help but think of the original idea. Because he can&#8217;t control his subconscious. Kind of like Leonardo&#8217;s suicidal wife. Yeah, it&#8217;s weak.<br />
3) Because it&#8217;s a dream. And after all nothing was stolen. And he will think that breaking up the company is his idea because he only knows about dream theft, not inception. Suspend disbelief, Ben&#8211;it&#8217;s more fun.<br />
4) I don&#8217;t dream like Tim Burton. do you?<br />
5) totally. More importantly, why is Leonardo the only person with issues? I could not be on that team.<br />
6) Too many questions. You try to kill yourself (in your dreams) and let me know how that works out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple vs Dell: Apple FAIL by OMG</title>
		<link>http://www.byrnecreative.com/blog/2009/07/apple-vs-dell-apple-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>OMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 05:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byrnecreative.com/blog/?p=33#comment-247</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe this Dave guy. Are you for real!? You damage your own machine and you expect Apple to pay for it? What if you just bought a new BMW and you accidently ding the door or drive into a telephone pole, should BMW pay to get it fixed? Wow, your absurdity is killing me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe this Dave guy. Are you for real!? You damage your own machine and you expect Apple to pay for it? What if you just bought a new BMW and you accidently ding the door or drive into a telephone pole, should BMW pay to get it fixed? Wow, your absurdity is killing me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Disruptive iPad 3G? by Katie</title>
		<link>http://www.byrnecreative.com/blog/2010/04/the-disruptive-ipad-3g/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 14:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byrnecreative.com/blog/?p=220#comment-241</guid>
		<description>If Apple and AT&amp;T (or anyone else) had been willing to sell me an iPod Touch w/ 3G, I never would have bought a smart phone. It&#039;s driven me nuts for years now that you can&#039;t get *just* a data plan w/o voice. Now you can, but only with this device that for various reasons, I don&#039;t want. Maybe by the time by shiny new Verizon contract has run its 2 year course, I&#039;ll have more options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Apple and AT&amp;T (or anyone else) had been willing to sell me an iPod Touch w/ 3G, I never would have bought a smart phone. It&#8217;s driven me nuts for years now that you can&#8217;t get *just* a data plan w/o voice. Now you can, but only with this device that for various reasons, I don&#8217;t want. Maybe by the time by shiny new Verizon contract has run its 2 year course, I&#8217;ll have more options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In defense of the individual mandate by Haar</title>
		<link>http://www.byrnecreative.com/blog/2010/03/in-defense-of-the-individual-mandate/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Haar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byrnecreative.com/blog/?p=211#comment-189</guid>
		<description>The Militia Act of 1792 was the first instance of the U.S. Government requiring private citizens to procure a good or service.  It may be a terrible idea but it&#039;s been done before.  I agree that the &quot;who&quot;  on the supply end is the big problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Militia Act of 1792 was the first instance of the U.S. Government requiring private citizens to procure a good or service.  It may be a terrible idea but it&#8217;s been done before.  I agree that the &#8220;who&#8221;  on the supply end is the big problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best. Worst. Shirt. Ever. by Craig Willford</title>
		<link>http://www.byrnecreative.com/blog/2010/03/best-worst-shirt-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Willford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byrnecreative.com/blog/2010/03/best-worst-shirt-ever/#comment-173</guid>
		<description>wow. that&#039;s lovely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow. that&#8217;s lovely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple vs Dell: Apple FAIL by Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.byrnecreative.com/blog/2009/07/apple-vs-dell-apple-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byrnecreative.com/blog/?p=33#comment-170</guid>
		<description>Simply put. Dell has superior customer service in regards to accidental damages over Apple Care.

I recently bought a brandnew MacBook Pro 15&quot; for around $1700 on January 1st. During superbowl sunday, a clumsy friend spilled water on my keyboard, completely ruining my logic board among other components. 

I visited my local Mac Store (Boston) the following day with my tale of woe. The Genius informed me that the repairs for my computer would total $1255 as the flat rate for water damage repair. I lamented how this was outrageous. Though i understand Apple does not cover any physical damages to their products, i felt cheated. My laptop was brand new and only 1.5 months old! I would have to pay almost the entire cost of new computer to get it fixed! After some debating and convincing, the Genius agreed to make an exception due to how recently i had purchased the new computer. They shipped it out to CA for repairs and had it back in about a week, fixing everything that was damaged, including the minor damages like scratches on the exterior body (though i believe the cases are almost designed to scratch). So my first round with apple care and support was awesome. 

Later that week I left for Switzerland to visit a friend for a week. I return home, tired, jet lagged and slightly sick but nonetheless, ready to head back to work. As y most unfortunate luck would have it, the very first day back in the office, the very first hour, I bump my desk accidentally an open travel mug of OJ on my desk spills across the keyboard of my 2 week old repaired computer! FML! What luck!? 

I am crushed, but i decide to return to the apple store to plead my case of misfortune, with minor hopes of a personable, sympathetic understanding of my case of sh*t luck and a hopeful repeat of events in regards to repair. Oh how i was mistaken.

The Genius listens to my tale, very sympathetic and personally, hearing how this is twice in a month and how the original case was handled. He says &quot;Let me see what i can do for you&quot; and returns from a backroom (I assume to look up the record of my previous work order and discuss with some higher-up manager) to inform me, &quot;Due to the physical damage, we unfortunately cannot cover you laptop for repairs, however, at a flat rate (???) of $1255 (almost the cost of the computer originally) they could replace the parts. I pleaded, informing him how the laptop is barely 2 months old, how I, the broke intern/student having just returned from vacation, have no such funds for the repairs, and how the circumstance was previously handled, tried my best to convince him that it was rather unfair to charge me such a price (how can they not even have a limited 90 full coverage for accidents on some of the most expensive computers on the market???!).

He only replies to say, &quot;I&#039;m surprised to hear you were able to get the original issue handled free of charge. Im sorry there is no coverage for your issue. It will cost $1255 to repair your damages (regardless of however extensive or costly the damages actually were).

I ask, &quot;Is there some kind of payment option? I&#039;m rather broke but I live on this laptop for work/school/life, I can&#039;t afford not to have it repaired, surely there is a payment plan we could work out?&quot;

He replies, &quot;Unfortunately there is not. I believe there is an apple credit care you could apply for (WTF?!) that could help you finance the repairs.&quot;

The last thing in the world i want to do is apply for an Apple store credit card in order to fix my laptop that i feel deserves to be covered free of charge. 

I say to him, &quot;This is rather absurd, dont you think? Im paying about the cost of a new laptop for the repairs on a computer that is barely 60 days old! i could buy a brand new Dell with better specs than my MBP for that cost, and Dell will replace it for any reason, free of charge for 3 years! I hate windows, so I&#039;d much rather use a Mac OS, but this doesn&#039;t even seem worth it!&quot;

His reply, &quot;Well maybe that&#039;s what you ought to do.&quot; (WTF? Telling the customer the best advice they can offer for support is to leave their brand for the competition?)  

You have GOT to be kidding me Apple. Your business is so content and sucessful at being profitable that you readily will throw your customers to the wind when they need support that logically seems reasonable to request AFTER REPAIRING IT ALREADY A WEEK PRIOR FOR FREE. Rather than make the customer feel connected and personally cared about, the Genius (ha &#039;Genius&#039;) says my best option is to say &quot;F*ck It&quot; and switch to Dell. 

Gee, thanks for all the impeccable support Apple. You really stand behind your customers and your relations with them. The absurdity is killing me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simply put. Dell has superior customer service in regards to accidental damages over Apple Care.</p>
<p>I recently bought a brandnew MacBook Pro 15&#8243; for around $1700 on January 1st. During superbowl sunday, a clumsy friend spilled water on my keyboard, completely ruining my logic board among other components. </p>
<p>I visited my local Mac Store (Boston) the following day with my tale of woe. The Genius informed me that the repairs for my computer would total $1255 as the flat rate for water damage repair. I lamented how this was outrageous. Though i understand Apple does not cover any physical damages to their products, i felt cheated. My laptop was brand new and only 1.5 months old! I would have to pay almost the entire cost of new computer to get it fixed! After some debating and convincing, the Genius agreed to make an exception due to how recently i had purchased the new computer. They shipped it out to CA for repairs and had it back in about a week, fixing everything that was damaged, including the minor damages like scratches on the exterior body (though i believe the cases are almost designed to scratch). So my first round with apple care and support was awesome. </p>
<p>Later that week I left for Switzerland to visit a friend for a week. I return home, tired, jet lagged and slightly sick but nonetheless, ready to head back to work. As y most unfortunate luck would have it, the very first day back in the office, the very first hour, I bump my desk accidentally an open travel mug of OJ on my desk spills across the keyboard of my 2 week old repaired computer! FML! What luck!? </p>
<p>I am crushed, but i decide to return to the apple store to plead my case of misfortune, with minor hopes of a personable, sympathetic understanding of my case of sh*t luck and a hopeful repeat of events in regards to repair. Oh how i was mistaken.</p>
<p>The Genius listens to my tale, very sympathetic and personally, hearing how this is twice in a month and how the original case was handled. He says &#8220;Let me see what i can do for you&#8221; and returns from a backroom (I assume to look up the record of my previous work order and discuss with some higher-up manager) to inform me, &#8220;Due to the physical damage, we unfortunately cannot cover you laptop for repairs, however, at a flat rate (???) of $1255 (almost the cost of the computer originally) they could replace the parts. I pleaded, informing him how the laptop is barely 2 months old, how I, the broke intern/student having just returned from vacation, have no such funds for the repairs, and how the circumstance was previously handled, tried my best to convince him that it was rather unfair to charge me such a price (how can they not even have a limited 90 full coverage for accidents on some of the most expensive computers on the market???!).</p>
<p>He only replies to say, &#8220;I&#8217;m surprised to hear you were able to get the original issue handled free of charge. Im sorry there is no coverage for your issue. It will cost $1255 to repair your damages (regardless of however extensive or costly the damages actually were).</p>
<p>I ask, &#8220;Is there some kind of payment option? I&#8217;m rather broke but I live on this laptop for work/school/life, I can&#8217;t afford not to have it repaired, surely there is a payment plan we could work out?&#8221;</p>
<p>He replies, &#8220;Unfortunately there is not. I believe there is an apple credit care you could apply for (WTF?!) that could help you finance the repairs.&#8221;</p>
<p>The last thing in the world i want to do is apply for an Apple store credit card in order to fix my laptop that i feel deserves to be covered free of charge. </p>
<p>I say to him, &#8220;This is rather absurd, dont you think? Im paying about the cost of a new laptop for the repairs on a computer that is barely 60 days old! i could buy a brand new Dell with better specs than my MBP for that cost, and Dell will replace it for any reason, free of charge for 3 years! I hate windows, so I&#8217;d much rather use a Mac OS, but this doesn&#8217;t even seem worth it!&#8221;</p>
<p>His reply, &#8220;Well maybe that&#8217;s what you ought to do.&#8221; (WTF? Telling the customer the best advice they can offer for support is to leave their brand for the competition?)  </p>
<p>You have GOT to be kidding me Apple. Your business is so content and sucessful at being profitable that you readily will throw your customers to the wind when they need support that logically seems reasonable to request AFTER REPAIRING IT ALREADY A WEEK PRIOR FOR FREE. Rather than make the customer feel connected and personally cared about, the Genius (ha &#8216;Genius&#8217;) says my best option is to say &#8220;F*ck It&#8221; and switch to Dell. </p>
<p>Gee, thanks for all the impeccable support Apple. You really stand behind your customers and your relations with them. The absurdity is killing me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Mac Software Kit by Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.byrnecreative.com/blog/2010/01/my-mac-software-kit/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byrnecreative.com/blog/?p=168#comment-156</guid>
		<description>I was a macbook pro user for about 2 years (until it was inconsiderately stolen 2 weeks ago). 

SMC Fan Control: This probably doesn&#039;t apply to your desktop setup, but I was a big fan of SMC Fan Control. I was never really impressed or happy with the way that OS X decided to only idle the fans and/or go into jet airliner take-off mode. This little app provided a lot of control over when and how the system fans operated.

IrfanView (but not): In my time in OS X I&#039;ve also never found a suitable replacement for IrfanView - one of my most-used PC programs. It is a super fast and lightweight image viewer, cropper, resizer and resampler. This set of features conveniently encompasses 90% of what I need from an image program in my day-to-day professional existence. If anybody knows of anything for OS X (ideally, free), I&#039;d love to know.

MS Office: I am tethered to a predominantly Windows-based corporate network (including my own workstation), so this was more or less a necessity - especially for the exchange client. It has nice some interface features, and is clearly still better than StarOffice or the other alternatives, but it also still gets its ass handed to it by office 2k7 for PC when considering corporate compatibility and features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a macbook pro user for about 2 years (until it was inconsiderately stolen 2 weeks ago). </p>
<p>SMC Fan Control: This probably doesn&#8217;t apply to your desktop setup, but I was a big fan of SMC Fan Control. I was never really impressed or happy with the way that OS X decided to only idle the fans and/or go into jet airliner take-off mode. This little app provided a lot of control over when and how the system fans operated.</p>
<p>IrfanView (but not): In my time in OS X I&#8217;ve also never found a suitable replacement for IrfanView &#8211; one of my most-used PC programs. It is a super fast and lightweight image viewer, cropper, resizer and resampler. This set of features conveniently encompasses 90% of what I need from an image program in my day-to-day professional existence. If anybody knows of anything for OS X (ideally, free), I&#8217;d love to know.</p>
<p>MS Office: I am tethered to a predominantly Windows-based corporate network (including my own workstation), so this was more or less a necessity &#8211; especially for the exchange client. It has nice some interface features, and is clearly still better than StarOffice or the other alternatives, but it also still gets its ass handed to it by office 2k7 for PC when considering corporate compatibility and features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Mac Software Kit by Brian Issleb</title>
		<link>http://www.byrnecreative.com/blog/2010/01/my-mac-software-kit/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Issleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byrnecreative.com/blog/?p=168#comment-155</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not doing much Mac development these days (the peril of working primarily in .NET) but I&#039;ll definitely have to check some of these out.

OmniGraffle sounds interesting, because I&#039;m sich of doing wireframes and prototypes in PhotoShop. On the other hand, its layering capability is hard to beat for showing people how designs might look with various layers turned on/off. Any competitors for that functionality?

I&#039;ve seen you mention Coda several times now. I&#039;ve always used BBedit exclusively for Mac development, but after getting to know Visual Studio better I think it would be hard to go back to not having an IDE. So the next  non-.NET project I work on might have Coda written on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not doing much Mac development these days (the peril of working primarily in .NET) but I&#8217;ll definitely have to check some of these out.</p>
<p>OmniGraffle sounds interesting, because I&#8217;m sich of doing wireframes and prototypes in PhotoShop. On the other hand, its layering capability is hard to beat for showing people how designs might look with various layers turned on/off. Any competitors for that functionality?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen you mention Coda several times now. I&#8217;ve always used BBedit exclusively for Mac development, but after getting to know Visual Studio better I think it would be hard to go back to not having an IDE. So the next  non-.NET project I work on might have Coda written on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
